Truth in a Haystack

Resistance

Contested term

This term is defined differently across political, cultural, or academic perspectives. We present the range rather than choosing one.

International law framework

Under international law, peoples under foreign occupation have a recognized right to self-determination, and some legal scholars argue this includes a right to armed resistance against military targets. UN General Assembly resolutions have recognized the right of peoples under colonial and foreign domination to struggle for liberation. However, IHL prohibits attacks targeting civilians regardless of any political cause. Armed groups exercising "resistance" remain bound by the laws of war.

Source: UN GA Resolution 3070 (1973); Additional Protocol I (1977); ICRC commentary

Hamas / Palestinian militant framing

Hamas, Palestinian Islamic Jihad, and their supporters describe all armed operations against Israel — including the October 7, 2023 massacre of Israeli civilians — as legitimate resistance against occupation and oppression. This framing is used to confer political legitimacy on attacks that killed 1,200 civilians and resulted in the taking of 251 hostages.

Source: Hamas official statements; Al-Qassam Brigades communiqués

Israeli government / Western legal view

The October 7 attacks and similar operations targeting civilians constitute terrorism under the laws of the designating nations and war crimes under IHL — regardless of any claimed political justification. International law does not permit attacks on civilians as a means of political resistance. Using "resistance" as a framing for the October 7 massacre is viewed as a deliberate effort to normalize atrocity.

Source: IHL: Additional Protocol I, Article 51(2); Israeli Foreign Ministry; U.S. State Department

Sources

  • UN General Assembly Resolution 3070 (1973)
  • Additional Protocol I (1977), Articles 48–51
  • ICRC, "IHL and Terrorism"
← Back to Glossary