“The UN Human Rights Council works by the principles of "universality, impartiality, objectivity and non-selectivity"”
Not supported. The Council's founding resolution promises "non-selectivity", yet its permanent agenda has one item (Item 7) devoted to a single situation, Israel and the Palestinian territories, and no other. By UN Watch's count it has condemned Israel more often than the rest of the world combined. Then-Secretary-General Kofi Annan criticized its focus in its first year. The Council does also investigate Syria, North Korea, Eritrea and others, and in 2026 its Gaza inquiry documented abuses by Hamas.
What this rates: whether the body's claim to be impartial is supported by the record — not whether any particular ruling or report is right. The evidence on both sides is shown with sources. These bodies are cited elsewhere on this site as sources for what they ruled, found or alleged, not as proof that the underlying facts are true.
What the Council claims
The General Assembly resolution that created the Council in 2006 says its work "shall be guided by the principles of universality, impartiality, objectivity and non-selectivity."
Evidence against the claim
- A permanent, single-country agenda item. Since 2007 the Council's standing agenda has included Item 7, "Human rights situation in Palestine and other occupied Arab territories." No other country or conflict has its own permanent item; every other situation is handled under general items.
- Volume of condemnations. UN Watch, a Geneva-based watchdog that is openly critical of the UN's treatment of Israel, counts more Council resolutions condemning Israel since 2006 than condemning all other countries combined.
- Early warning from the Secretary-General. In November 2006, after the Council held three special sessions on Israel in its first months, Kofi Annan told it: "There are surely other situations, besides the one in the Middle East, which would merit scrutiny at a special session," naming Darfur.
- An open-ended inquiry. In 2021 the Council created a standing Commission of Inquiry on Israel and the Palestinian territories with no end date. In 2022 one of its three members, Miloon Kothari, said social media was controlled largely by "the Jewish lobby"; he later apologized. All three members resigned in July 2025, citing age, health and other reasons.
- Withdrawals. The United States left the Council in 2018 and again in 2025, citing its treatment of Israel among other reasons.
Evidence for the Council
- The Council also runs inquiries and special rapporteurs on Syria, North Korea, Eritrea, Iran, Myanmar and others; its 2014 inquiry on North Korea found crimes against humanity.
- Supporters argue Item 7 reflects an occupation that has lasted since 1967, which they consider unique.
- Its Commission of Inquiry's 2026 report documented executions, torture and abuse of civilians by Hamas-affiliated forces in Gaza (see our fact check).
Rating: Not supported
A standing agenda item devoted to one state, when every other situation in the world shares general items, cannot be squared with the Council's own principle of "non-selectivity." That is a structural fact, independent of whether any individual report is accurate.
Scale and intent — side by side
October 7 (Hamas): about 770–840 civilians killed in one day. Intent to kill civilians is documented — in Hamas's written orders ("kill as many people as possible"), its fighters' own footage, and its leaders' statements.
Gaza (Israel): civilian deaths in the tens of thousands over two years (the civilian share is disputed, roughly 60% to 83%). Israel's stated aim is to destroy Hamas; warnings and large aid volumes are documented, and several incidents have been acknowledged by the IDF as errors. Intent to kill civilians is alleged, and has not been established by any court.
Both facts matter, and neither cancels the other. Every party's alleged crimes, on one scale: War Crimes Ledger.
Sources & References
- › UN General Assembly Resolution 60/251 (2006), creating the Council: "universality, impartiality, objectivity and non-selectivity"
- › UN Watch (Geneva NGO that monitors the UN; critical of its treatment of Israel): chart of all Human Rights Council country condemnations
- › JURIST: Annan urges UN rights body to avoid politics, focus more on Darfur (Nov 2006)
- › JTA: Commission of Inquiry member Miloon Kothari apologizes for "Jewish lobby" remark (Aug 2022)
- › Times of Israel: all three members of the UN Commission of Inquiry on Israel resign (July 2025)
- › OHCHR: Human Rights Council home (country mandates and commissions of inquiry)